Relevant ad on Gaia
Gaia Online is free, so it can display ads, right?
Wrong. First, Gaia Online is not a game. It’s a forum. It’s a forum made from PhPbb, a ressource that is 100% free and takes 30, maybe 40 minutes to install. There are no music to write, there is no marketing to pay, no programmers, no technical support, no add-ons, no boss to design, no graphics to draw (unlike you consider gay, immobile 2d avatars ”graphics”), nothing. We are not saying Gaia doesn’t have the rights to display ads, we are saying that Gaia is in no way a real game and that ads are more than enough to pay for its bandwith.
Oh, and here is the kind of ”relevant ad” Gaia Online used to display:

**NOTE** I take no credit for this picture. It has been sent to me by e-mail and the author prefer to remain unanymous.
What kind of message are they trying to send? That women are objects? That women need to wear cute little uniforms and that the sole point of their life has to be seduction? And frankly how could Gaia ever show this to 13-14 years old children? This is one of the reasons we are so disgusted of Gaia Online; not only do they sell virtual crap at a super-expensive price, but they still harass us with their crappy, ugly ads.
Since then, Gaia stopped that kind of advertising (obviously), but you can still see that ads presently on the website are always directected at children, such as smilies, education material, etc.
February 26th, 2009 at 1:41 am
March 3rd, 2009 at 8:35 am
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru
March 20th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
March 21st, 2009 at 5:41 pm
It depends also when that “screen shot” was taken. I remember back in early ‘05 they did have that sort of advertising, but that was before Gaia announced that it was a site relevant to 13 year olds and up.
But with that in mind, is that ad relevant now?
To Spike: Filters have nothing to do with ads. Filters are for profanity only, since many users do swear.
And it’s more like a million people think it’s a good site.
April 29th, 2009 at 2:22 am
I don’t think thats accurate.
July 11th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
August 5th, 2009 at 3:39 am
August 13th, 2009 at 8:37 am
August 30th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
September 10th, 2009 at 11:41 pm
March 5th, 2010 at 12:28 pm